The thought of driver less cars also makes me a little uncomfortable. I do agree that there are many, many drivers who are out there who shouldn't have a licence because they are often distracting themselves by either texting, eating, etc while driving, ultimately putting everyone around them in immediate danger. In the article, Driver less Cars Get California License, it talks about cars with CPUs have already been tested, and given approval in California. This "eaks" me a little bit because it may seem a little safer, but what if someone who doesn't have a "smart car" blows the red light when the computer is telling your car to go. With computers, it may not consider reaction a human may have. Could it reduce accidents? Maybe, and I honestly hope it does.
I think humans are most likely to make errors. That's what makes us human, the errors we make. Technology can reduce these errors significantly, and has as it changes.
Your response to smart cars is a really valid point. I don't think a computer operated car will have the same response time as a human to such situations.
ReplyDeleteI agree with driver less cars making things uncomfortable. If something malfunctions than what's supposed to happen while a vehicle is in motion? There's still so many development issues that need to be resolved.
ReplyDeleteEven if it is popular, I don't think so that I can trust a machine as a driver! :)
ReplyDelete